The whole world has been alarmed and greatly gripped by climate change emergency for years now.
As if calling the propagators of climate change alarmists, a new group led by a Nobel Prize laureate, comprising more than 1,000 scientists and scholars have signed a document declaring climate science is based more on personal beliefs and political agenda than sound, rigorous science.
The World Climate Declaration states climate science “should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.
“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration reads.
The declaration was organized by Climate Intelligence, an independent policy foundation founded in 2019 by Dutch emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and Dutch science journalist Marcel Crok.
The U.K. website the Daily Sceptic reported one of the lead authors of the declaration, atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen, has called the current climate narrative “absurd.” Yet relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists has generated a widely accepted narrative that the science is “settled.”
“We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models,” the WCD states. “In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.”
Last week, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which spends $368 billion for “green” energy with the aim of reducing CO2 emissions by 40% by 2030. When Joe Biden was vice president under Barack Obama, the administration subsidized “green” energy with federal grants and tax breaks.
Joe Biden himself announced in 2009 a $535 million loan guarantee for the solar panel company Solyndra to go along with $700 million in venture capital funding. Biden said the plant built with that money would power more than half a million homes. But two years later, the company filed for bankruptcy and shut down its operations.
The World Climate Declaration points out that since emerging from the Little Ice Age in the mid-19th century, the world has warmed significantly less than predicted by the U.N.’s International Panel on Climate Change’s models.
“The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change,” the WCD states.
The declaration argues Earth’s climate has varied, with cold and warm periods, for as long as the planet has existed, and it is “no surprise that we are experiencing a period of warming.”
The climate models “are not remotely plausible as global policy tools,” ignoring, for one, the benefits of carbon dioxide, which is “not a pollutant.
“It is essential to all life on Earth,” the declaration says. “Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth; additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yield of crops worldwide.”
There is no statistical evidence, the signatories say, “that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and such-like natural disasters, or making them more frequent.
“There is no climate emergency. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”
Last year, Steven Koonin, an under-secretary of science in the Obama administration, published a book entitled “Unsettled” that said “the science is insufficient to make useful projections about how the climate will change over the coming decades, much less what our actions will be.”
The idea that climate change is settled demeans and chills the scientific enterprise, he contended, “retarding its progress in these important matters.”
In 2020, the long-time green activist Michael Shellenberger wrote a book called “Apocalypse
Never” that lamented the conversation about climate change has “spiraled out of control.”
Are the opinions of 1,200 scientists greater than the opinions of the millions of other scientists? Interesting to have this categorized under “news” here.
The term ‘scientist’ was first used by a priest called William Whewell in 1833. Today any dimwit with a first degree in a field connected to physics, chemistry, biology or even medicine might claim to be a scientist. Science is a process of logical enquiry but most of the people who self-describe themselves as ‘scientists’ are actually fairly low level technologists.
Real scientists are thinkers and philosophers who use the rules of science to try and falsify their own conclusions. Most academics don’t work that way and can therefore be dismissed as teachers of known facts (which is admirable but doesn’t make them scientists).
Think of the likes of Einstein, Franklin, Jefferson, Gold, Feynman and the ilk – free thinkers rather than those who play the game chasing research grants and add little to human understanding.