Conference of Directors and Chief Road Traffic Officers of the Federation Disagrees with Recent Federal High Court Judgement Barring FCT DRTS from Road Traffic Enforcement

… Urges FCT-DRTS to swiftly appeal the court’s ruling

Paschal Emeka, Abuja | Posted October 5th, 2024

The Conference of Directors and Chief Road Traffic Officers of the Federation. ( VIOs) has kicked against the recent judgment of a Federal High Court barring the Directorate of Road Traffic Services (DRTS), also known as the VIO, in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) from stopping, confiscating, and imposing fines on traffic offenders.

Subscribe To The Best Team In Conservative, Business, Technology, Lifestyle And Digital News Realtime! support@ddnewsonline.com

Reacting to the judgment, in a statement signed by Engr. Paul Ugbe,Bepeh, National Chairman of Conference of Directors and Chief Road Traffic Officers of the Federation, they expressed shock and disappointment over the court ruling.

The statement read; “while we hold the Nigerian Judicial System in high esteem, we are deeply shocked and extremely disappointed by this ruling.

“This judgement comes at a critical time when the FCT, alongside other states of the Federation, are working tirelessly to reduce road traffic crashes by 50% from 2020 to 2030, in line with the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety and Goal 11 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aims to make cities safe and resilient for all.

Subscribe To The Best Team In Conservative, Business, Technology, Lifestyle And Digital News Realtime! support@ddnewsonline.com

“The implications of this judgement are far-reaching and detrimental to the safety of lives and property on our roads and highways.

“By barring the enforcement of road traffic regulations of FCT, the ruling jeopardizes the efforts being made to curb road traffic crashes, endangers road users, and undermines the authority of the FCT and the states in performing their constitutional duties on road traffic matters, even at a time of ember months when it is expedient to regulate road traffic activities for safety of lives and properties.

“The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, under Part 1 Section 1, Subsections 1, 2, and 3, as well as Part 2 Section 4, Subsections 1, 2, 3, and 4, and Section 7 (a, b, and c), explicitly grants the FCT and states the residual power to legislate on matters not contained in the exclusive and concurrent lists.

Subscribe To The Best Team In Conservative, Business, Technology, Lifestyle And Digital News Realtime! support@ddnewsonline.com

“Road traffic matters and motor vehicle administrations fall squarely under these provisions, granting states the authority to manage and regulate traffic within their jurisdictions.

“This judgement, however, undermines this constitutional mandate under the guise of protecting human rights, specifically the right to freedom of movement.

“While we fully recognize the importance of respect for human rights and need to protect citizens’ rights, it is important to acknowledge that road traffic regulations enforcement is a matter of public safety, not a violation of human rights.

“The right to movement must be balanced with the responsibility of ensuring the safety and security of all road users by statutory government agencies.

“Traffic regulations exist to protect citizens from harm, prevent accidents, and save lives. Allowing motorists to violate these laws without consequence will result in chaos, increased road traffic crashes, and a higher fatality rate on our roads.

Subscribe To The Best Team In Conservative, Business, Technology, Lifestyle And Digital News Realtime! support@ddnewsonline.com

“The decision of the court, if allowed to stand, will not only weaken the ability of the FCT DRTS and other state road traffic agencies to enforce safety regulations but also set a dangerous precedent for other states striving to improve road safety across the nation.

“Road traffic enforcement is not an arbitrary exercise of power; it is a necessary function of governance aimed at ensuring that drivers obey the laws designed to protect all road users.

“We therefore call on the relevant authorities, including the Nigeria Judiciary and human rights advocates and activists, to join hands to ensure that the broader implications of this judgement will not negatively impact public safety.

“Protecting the right to movement must go hand in hand with ensuring that citizens can move safely on roads that are free from reckless drivers, poorly maintained vehicles, and dangerous conditions.

“The National Conference body of Road Traffic Officers urges the FCT DRTS to appeal this decision and ensure that road traffic enforcement is not hindered but implemented accordingly.

Subscribe To The Best Team In Conservative, Business, Technology, Lifestyle And Digital News Realtime! support@ddnewsonline.com

“The safety of Nigerians on our roads must remain a top priority. As a nation, we can not afford to jeopardize the gains we have made in reducing road crashes and fatalities.

“We reaffirm our commitment to working towards achieving the targets set by the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety which Nigeria is a signatory to its implementation and also the Sustainable Development Goals, which we will continue to advocate for stronger road traffic laws and their enforcement to ensure the safety of all road users.

“Nigeria road users should be protected and not exposed to risk of road crashes which this judgement aims to achieve if not appealed to upturn it.